Skip to content

Conversation

@iuhilnehc-ynos
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #296

Signed-off-by: Chen Lihui [email protected]

@ivanpauno
Copy link
Member

Can you add this to the remapping design doc? Similarly to what was done in ros2/design#299 for #837.

Particularly, this change looks good to me (I haven't checked the implementation yet).
It enables a new use case (that was possible in ROS 1), without breaking API at all.

@ivanpauno ivanpauno added enhancement New feature or request more-information-needed Further information is required labels Oct 22, 2020
@iuhilnehc-ynos
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ivanpauno

Can you add this to the remapping design doc?

Yes, I'll create a new PR for the remapping design doc for the FQN after ros2/design#299 is merged because some examples seem to be changed.

@iuhilnehc-ynos iuhilnehc-ynos force-pushed the topic-remap-fully-qualified-node-name branch from 09491ea to 8a90f74 Compare November 5, 2020 10:38
Not to support __node and __ns that will break API

Signed-off-by: Chen Lihui <[email protected]>
@audrow audrow changed the base branch from master to rolling June 28, 2022 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request more-information-needed Further information is required

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Name remapping specific to a fully-qualified node's name

2 participants