feat!: publish packages under the @rsocket org #274
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
viglucci
force-pushed
the
feature/rsocket-npm-org
branch
from
8fb42d0 to
c4787f9
Compare
Signed-off-by: Kevin Viglucci <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Viglucci <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Viglucci <[email protected]>
viglucci
force-pushed
the
feature/rsocket-npm-org
branch
from
c4787f9 to
4521946
Compare
viglucci
added
1.0
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update packages to use the
@rsocketNPM org namespace.Motivation:
@rsocketorganization name on NPM so we should use it.@rsocketorg will help differentiate from published0.xversions.Note: I plan to mark existing
rsocket-1.0.0-alphaversions are deprecated and will post an issue explaining consumers will need to migrate to installing from the new namespace. see: https://docs.npmjs.com/deprecating-and-undeprecating-packages-or-package-versions