-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: adjust webhook v2 #4079
Conversation
Allure Test reports for this run are available at: |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #4079 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 91.04% 91.13% +0.08%
===========================================
Files 629 629
Lines 32841 32837 -4
Branches 7792 7791 -1
===========================================
+ Hits 29901 29925 +24
- Misses 2689 2696 +7
+ Partials 251 216 -35 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Allure Test reports for this run are available at: |
|
What are the changes introduced in this PR?
What is the related Linear task?
Resolves INT-3130
Please explain the objectives of your changes below
This source is refactored to cleanly use the new webhook v2 specification for information beyond request body.
Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?
No
Any new dependencies introduced with this change?
No
Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.
No
Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?
Make small optimisations by cleaning likes like lodash.deepcopy with no effect.
@coderabbitai review
Developer checklist
My code follows the style guidelines of this project
No breaking changes are being introduced.
All related docs linked with the PR?
All changes manually tested?
Any documentation changes needed with this change?
Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?
Is the PR limited to one linear task?
Are relevant unit and component test-cases added in new readability format?
Reviewer checklist
Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?
Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.