Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix missing multiagent code #483

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025
Merged

Conversation

leehuwuj
Copy link
Collaborator

@leehuwuj leehuwuj commented Jan 17, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced multiagent template installation process
    • Improved code template handling for Python-based agents
  • Style

    • Minor formatting improvements in logging and string representations
    • Refined assertion and code interpretation formatting
  • Chores

    • Updated template components for better readability and consistency

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jan 17, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: f111776

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
create-llama Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a patch for creating a Llama multiagent code template. The changes primarily focus on enhancing the template installation process by adding support for copying multiagent-specific files. The modifications are minor and include formatting adjustments in various Python files related to agents, workflows, and code interpretation. The changes aim to improve the handling of multiagent templates and ensure proper file inclusion.

Changes

File Change Summary
.changeset/fair-months-camp.md New patch titled "create-llama" addressing multiagent code inclusion
helpers/python.ts Added logic to copy multiagent overrides when "multiagent" template is selected
templates/components/agents/python/blog/app/workflows/planner.py Minor string formatting change in get_refine_plan_prompt_kwargs method
templates/components/agents/python/financial_report/app/workflows/financial_report.py Simplified assertion statements in __init__ method
templates/components/engines/python/agent/tools/interpreter.py Adjusted logging statement formatting for code execution

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • marcusschiesser

Poem

🐰 Multiagent magic, code so bright,
Copying templates with rabbit's might!
Files dancing, templates gleam,
A coding adventure, a developer's dream!
Hop, hop, hooray for clean code today! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eec237c and f111776.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .changeset/fair-months-camp.md (1 hunks)
  • helpers/python.ts (1 hunks)
  • templates/components/agents/python/blog/app/workflows/planner.py (1 hunks)
  • templates/components/agents/python/financial_report/app/workflows/financial_report.py (1 hunks)
  • templates/components/engines/python/agent/tools/interpreter.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • .changeset/fair-months-camp.md
  • templates/components/agents/python/financial_report/app/workflows/financial_report.py
  • templates/components/engines/python/agent/tools/interpreter.py
  • templates/components/agents/python/blog/app/workflows/planner.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (27)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (20, 3.11, ubuntu-22.04, nextjs, --llamacloud)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (20, 3.11, ubuntu-22.04, nextjs, --example-file)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (20, 3.11, windows-latest, express, --llamacloud)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (20, 3.11, windows-latest, express, --example-file)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (20, 3.11, windows-latest, express, --no-files)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (20, 3.11, windows-latest, nextjs, --llamacloud)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (20, 3.11, windows-latest, nextjs, --example-file)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (20, 3.11, windows-latest, nextjs, --no-files)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (20, 3.11, macos-latest, nextjs, --llamacloud)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (20, 3.11, macos-latest, nextjs, --example-file)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (20, 3.11, macos-latest, nextjs, --no-files)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (18, 3.11, ubuntu-22.04, express, --example-file)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (18, 3.11, ubuntu-22.04, nextjs, --llamacloud)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (18, 3.11, ubuntu-22.04, nextjs, --example-file)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (18, 3.11, windows-latest, express, --llamacloud)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (18, 3.11, windows-latest, express, --example-file)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (18, 3.11, windows-latest, express, --no-files)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (18, 3.11, windows-latest, nextjs, --llamacloud)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (18, 3.11, windows-latest, nextjs, --example-file)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (18, 3.11, windows-latest, nextjs, --no-files)
  • GitHub Check: python (20, 3.11, ubuntu-22.04, fastapi, --example-file)
  • GitHub Check: python (20, 3.11, windows-latest, fastapi, --llamacloud)
  • GitHub Check: python (20, 3.11, windows-latest, fastapi, --example-file)
  • GitHub Check: python (20, 3.11, windows-latest, fastapi, --no-files)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (18, 3.11, macos-latest, nextjs, --example-file)
  • GitHub Check: typescript (18, 3.11, macos-latest, nextjs, --no-files)
  • GitHub Check: python (20, 3.11, macos-latest, fastapi, --example-file)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
helpers/python.ts (1)

483-489: LGTM! The implementation correctly addresses the missing multiagent code.

The added code block properly copies multiagent-specific files from the components directory when the template is set to "multiagent". This change aligns with the PR objective and follows the established patterns in the codebase.

Let's verify the multiagent template files exist:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: The multiagent template implementation is complete and correctly structured

The multiagent Python template contains all necessary components with proper implementations:

  • FastAPI chat endpoints
  • Streaming response handling
  • Agent workflow system
  • Function calling and tool integration support

The copy operation in helpers/python.ts will successfully transfer these files to the target project.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the multiagent template files exist in the expected location.

# Test: Check if the multiagent/python directory exists and contains files
ls -la templates/components/multiagent/python/

Length of output: 206


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Examine the contents of the multiagent/python/app directory and its files

# List contents of the app directory recursively
find templates/components/multiagent/python/app -type f -exec ls -la {} \;

# Show the contents of any Python files
find templates/components/multiagent/python/app -type f -name "*.py" -exec cat {} \;

Length of output: 18334

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@leehuwuj leehuwuj marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2025 09:25
@marcusschiesser marcusschiesser merged commit f73d46b into main Jan 17, 2025
47 checks passed
@marcusschiesser marcusschiesser deleted the lee/fix-missing-multiagent-code branch January 17, 2025 09:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants