Skip to content

Extend cargo dev rename_lint #14633

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor

@Jarcho Jarcho commented Apr 16, 2025

Based on #14616

Extends rename_lint to handle more cases and makes update_lints sort deprecated_lints.rs.

changelog: None

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 16, 2025

r? @samueltardieu

rustbot has assigned @samueltardieu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Apr 16, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 16, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@samueltardieu
Copy link
Contributor

Since it's waiting on #13223 and I'll be AFK for a while, reassigning similarly to #13223
r? @flip1995

@Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jarcho commented Apr 24, 2025

Since @flip1995 is busy r? clippy

@rustbot rustbot assigned y21 and unassigned flip1995 Apr 24, 2025
@Jarcho Jarcho added the S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work label Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants