Skip to content

Conversation

mina86
Copy link
Contributor

@mina86 mina86 commented Dec 3, 2023

Introduce split_at_checked and split_at_mut_checked methods to slices
types (including str) which are non-panicking versions of split_at and
split_at_mut respectively. This is analogous to get method being
non-panicking version of indexing.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 3, 2023

r? @m-ou-se

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 3, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@workingjubilee workingjubilee added S-waiting-on-ACP Status: PR has an ACP and is waiting for the ACP to complete. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 3, 2023
@mina86 mina86 force-pushed the c branch 2 times, most recently from 5715081 to 00cc349 Compare December 19, 2023 18:45
@mina86 mina86 changed the title core: introduce checked_split_at{,_mut} core: introduce split_at{,_mut}_checked Dec 19, 2023
@mina86
Copy link
Contributor Author

mina86 commented Dec 28, 2023

@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-ACP +S-waiting-on-review

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 28, 2023

Failed to set assignee to label: invalid assignee

Note: Only org members with at least the repository "read" role, users with write permissions, or people who have commented on the PR may be assigned.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-ACP Status: PR has an ACP and is waiting for the ACP to complete. labels Dec 28, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@tgross35 tgross35 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks pretty good, mostly docs

///
/// Returns `None` if `mid > len`.
///
/// # Examples
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I seem to recall a PR that removed a lot of # Examples headers whenever there was only one example, but it doesn't really matter (I know this is consistent)

@rustbot rustbot added has-merge-commits PR has merge commits, merge with caution. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 10, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 10, 2024

There are merge commits (commits with multiple parents) in your changes. We have a no merge policy so these commits will need to be removed for this pull request to be merged.

You can start a rebase with the following commands:

$ # rebase
$ git rebase -i master
$ # delete any merge commits in the editor that appears
$ git push --force-with-lease

The following commits are merge commits:

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 20, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #120136) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@mina86 comment @rustbot ready whenever you are ready for a re-review (you'll have to rebase and squash your commits before merge still)

Introduce split_at_checked and split_at_mut_checked methods to slices
types (including str) which are non-panicking versions of split_at and
split_at_mut  respectively.  This is analogous to get method being
non-panicking version of indexing.
@mina86
Copy link
Contributor Author

mina86 commented Jan 20, 2024

@rustbot ready

@dtolnay dtolnay assigned dtolnay and unassigned m-ou-se Jan 21, 2024
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jan 21, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 21, 2024

📌 Commit 50cbbef has been approved by dtolnay

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 21, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
core: introduce split_at{,_mut}_checked

Introduce split_at_checked and split_at_mut_checked methods to slices
types (including str) which are non-panicking versions of split_at and
split_at_mut  respectively.  This is analogous to get method being
non-panicking version of indexing.

- rust-lang/libs-team#308
- rust-lang#119128
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 22, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 50cbbef with merge e99b66b...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 22, 2024

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 22, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jan 22, 2024

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 22, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
core: introduce split_at{,_mut}_checked

Introduce split_at_checked and split_at_mut_checked methods to slices
types (including str) which are non-panicking versions of split_at and
split_at_mut  respectively.  This is analogous to get method being
non-panicking version of indexing.

- rust-lang/libs-team#308
- rust-lang#119128
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
core: introduce split_at{,_mut}_checked

Introduce split_at_checked and split_at_mut_checked methods to slices
types (including str) which are non-panicking versions of split_at and
split_at_mut  respectively.  This is analogous to get method being
non-panicking version of indexing.

- rust-lang/libs-team#308
- rust-lang#119128
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118578 (core: introduce split_at{,_mut}_checked)
 - rust-lang#119369 (exclude unexported macro bindings from extern crate)
 - rust-lang#119408 (xous: misc fixes + add network support)
 - rust-lang#119943 (std::net: bind update for using backlog as `-1` too.)
 - rust-lang#119948 (Make `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` migrated in edition 2024)
 - rust-lang#119999 (remote-test: use u64 to represent file size)
 - rust-lang#120152 (add help message for `exclusive_range_pattern` error)
 - rust-lang#120213 (Don't actually make bound ty/const for RTN)
 - rust-lang#120225 (Fix -Zremap-path-scope typo)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#119972 (Add `ErrCode`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 99b4f80 into rust-lang:master Jan 22, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 22, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118578 - mina86:c, r=dtolnay

core: introduce split_at{,_mut}_checked

Introduce split_at_checked and split_at_mut_checked methods to slices
types (including str) which are non-panicking versions of split_at and
split_at_mut  respectively.  This is analogous to get method being
non-panicking version of indexing.

- rust-lang/libs-team#308
- rust-lang#119128
@mina86 mina86 deleted the c branch January 27, 2024 06:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants