-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test(ui): add tuple-struct-where-clause-suggestion ui test for #91520 #138782
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot has assigned @petrochenkov. Use |
compiler-errors
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2025
r? compiler-errors @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#138609 (Add stack overflow handler for cygwin) - rust-lang#138639 (Clean UI tests 2 of n) - rust-lang#138773 (catch_unwind intrinsic: document return value) - rust-lang#138782 (test(ui): add tuple-struct-where-clause-suggestion ui test for rust-lang#91520) - rust-lang#138794 (expand: Do not report `cfg_attr` traces on macros as unused attributes) - rust-lang#138801 (triagebot: add autolabel rules for D-* and L-*) - rust-lang#138804 (Allow inlining for `Atomic*::from_ptr`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#138782 - karolzwolak:where-test-91520, r=compiler-errors test(ui): add tuple-struct-where-clause-suggestion ui test for rust-lang#91520 Fixes rust-lang#91520 I tried to also make it a .fixed test, but I failed to accomplish that. That's because of the 'consider annotating `Inner<T>` with `#[derive(Clone)]`' suggestion does not compile (conflicting Clone implementations), and I can't isolate them with `rustfix-only-machine-applicable` as both suggestions are not marked as `MachineApplicable`. Instead I just test that the where clause suggestion is applied to the correct line.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #91520
I tried to also make it a .fixed test, but I failed to accomplish that.
That's because of the 'consider annotating
Inner<T>
with#[derive(Clone)]
' suggestion does not compile (conflicting Clone implementations), and I can't isolate them withrustfix-only-machine-applicable
as both suggestions are not marked asMachineApplicable
.Instead I just test that the where clause suggestion is applied to the correct line.