Skip to content

Fix up partial res of segment in primitive resolution hack #139127

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2025

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors commented Mar 30, 2025

There is a hack in the resolver:

// In `a(::assoc_item)*` `a` cannot be a module. If `a` does resolve to a module we
// don't report an error right away, but try to fallback to a primitive type.

This fixes up the resolution for primitives which would otherwise resolve to a module, but we weren't also updating the res of the path segment, leading to weird diagnostics.

We explicitly call self.r.partial_res_map.insert instead of record_partial_res b/c we have recorded a partial res already, and we specifically want to override it.

cc #139095 (comment)

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 30, 2025

r? @Noratrieb

rustbot has assigned @Noratrieb.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 30, 2025
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

r? oli-obk as the person who approves all my prs lol

@rustbot rustbot assigned oli-obk and unassigned Noratrieb Apr 14, 2025
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Apr 14, 2025

took me a bit to grok, but this indeed just affects diagnostics

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 14, 2025

📌 Commit 18c787f has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 14, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#139127 (Fix up partial res of segment in primitive resolution hack)
 - rust-lang#139392 (Detect and provide suggestion for `&raw EXPR`)
 - rust-lang#139767 (Visit place in `BackwardIncompatibleDropHint` statement)
 - rust-lang#139777 (Remove `define_debug_via_print` for `ExistentialProjection`, use regular structural debug impl)
 - rust-lang#139796 (ptr docs: add missing backtics around 'usize')
 - rust-lang#139801 (Add myself to mailmap)
 - rust-lang#139804 (use `realpath` in `bootstrap.py` when creating build-dir)
 - rust-lang#139807 (Improve wording of post-merge report)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit a4adc00 into rust-lang:master Apr 14, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.88.0 milestone Apr 14, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139127 - compiler-errors:prim-ty-hack, r=oli-obk

Fix up partial res of segment in primitive resolution hack

There is a hack in the resolver:

```
// In `a(::assoc_item)*` `a` cannot be a module. If `a` does resolve to a module we
// don't report an error right away, but try to fallback to a primitive type.
```

This fixes up the resolution for primitives which would otherwise resolve to a module, but we weren't also updating the res of the path segment, leading to weird diagnostics.

We explicitly call `self.r.partial_res_map.insert` instead of `record_partial_res` b/c we have recorded a partial res already, and we specifically want to override it.

cc rust-lang#139095 (comment)
github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#139127 (Fix up partial res of segment in primitive resolution hack)
 - rust-lang#139392 (Detect and provide suggestion for `&raw EXPR`)
 - rust-lang#139767 (Visit place in `BackwardIncompatibleDropHint` statement)
 - rust-lang#139777 (Remove `define_debug_via_print` for `ExistentialProjection`, use regular structural debug impl)
 - rust-lang#139796 (ptr docs: add missing backtics around 'usize')
 - rust-lang#139801 (Add myself to mailmap)
 - rust-lang#139804 (use `realpath` in `bootstrap.py` when creating build-dir)
 - rust-lang#139807 (Improve wording of post-merge report)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants