-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.7k
Fix attribute target checking for macro calls #145788
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix attribute target checking for macro calls #145788
Conversation
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing |
Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use |
9dd2d71
to
e8f33c2
Compare
This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
@rustbot ready |
awesome, @bors r+ rollup |
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <[email protected]>
e8f33c2
to
fe81a79
Compare
@jdonszelmann Whoops my bad I just realized this will fail PR CI, forgot to bless my test after fixing tidy :P Should be good now |
@bors r+ |
…get, r=jdonszelmann Fix attribute target checking for macro calls Fixes #145779 r? `@jdonszelmann`
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
^ A test in the mir-opt test suite failed due to a stack overflow in the compiler. @jdonszelmann Maybe lets do a try run for the failed job? Or just retry if you feel confident |
@bors2 try jobs=test-various |
…get, r=<try> Fix attribute target checking for macro calls try-job: test-various
(I assumed various was a collection of several tests, but I think that assumption was wrong? I'll also queue the specific one to make sure) @bors2 try x86_64-mingw-1 |
Unknown argument "x86_64-mingw-1". Run |
@bors2 try jobs=x86_64-mingw-1 |
…get, r=<try> Fix attribute target checking for macro calls try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
Fixes #145779
r? @jdonszelmann