Skip to content

Conversation

Qelxiros
Copy link
Contributor

@Qelxiros Qelxiros commented Sep 8, 2025

This is the first of four smaller PRs that will eventually be equivalent to #139514.

A few notes:

  • I renamed new to open because open_dir takes &self and opens a subdirectory.
    • I also renamed open to open_file.
  • I'm not sure how to impl AsRawFd and friends because the common implementation uses PathBufs. How should I proceed here?

The other PRs will be based on this one, so I'll make drafts and mark them ready as their predecessors get merged. They might take a bit though; I've never done this particular thing with git before.

Tracking issue: #120426

r? @tgross35

try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: dist-various*
try-job: test-various*
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: x86_64-mingw*

@rustbot rustbot added O-windows Operating system: Windows S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 8, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 10, 2025
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisDenton I'll need your help for the Windows review

@Qelxiros
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@tgross35 tgross35 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks pretty good to me, just a few mechanical things here. There are a couple left over from the previous review, #146341 (comment), #146341 (comment), and (newly) #146341 (comment).

View changes since this review

let mut handle = ptr::null_mut();
let mut io_status = c::IO_STATUS_BLOCK::PENDING;
let access = opts.get_access_mode()? | c::SYNCHRONIZE;
let options = create_options | c::FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_NONALERT;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add a note about why this flag is set?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I no longer remember why I chose this one, and looking at it now, I'm not sure whether we should set this one, FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_ALERT, or neither. Maybe @ChrisDenton has thoughts?

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

From the top post:

* I'm not sure how to `impl AsRawFd` and friends because the `common` implementation uses `PathBuf`s. How should I proceed here?

I think it would be fine to include the impl AsRawFd only in unix/dir so it's only implemented if we have dirfd. I'll add an unresolved question to the tracking issue.

The other PRs will be based on this one, so I'll make drafts and mark them ready as their predecessors get merged. They might take a bit though; I've never done this particular thing with git before.

That is quite alright, there is no hurry :) For reference, the --update-refs rebase flag can be pretty useful when you're working with a stack (e.g. https://andrewlock.net/working-with-stacked-branches-in-git-is-easier-with-update-refs/)

@tgross35

This comment was marked as outdated.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
minimal dirfd implementation (1/4)

try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: dist-various*
try-job: test-various*
try-job: x86_64-msvc*
try-job: x86_64-mingw
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment was marked as outdated.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment was marked as outdated.

@tgross35

This comment was marked as outdated.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
minimal dirfd implementation (1/4)

try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: dist-various*
try-job: test-various*
try-job: x86_64-msvc*
try-job: x86_64-mingw*
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment was marked as outdated.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@bors2 try

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
minimal dirfd implementation (1/4)

try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: dist-various*
try-job: test-various*
try-job: x86_64-msvc*
try-job: x86_64-mingw*
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Sep 11, 2025

💔 Test for ba4037e failed: CI. Failed jobs:

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
use rand::RngCore;

use super::Dir;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a gate on miri to not be unused

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@bors2 try

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
minimal dirfd implementation (1/4)

try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: dist-various*
try-job: test-various*
try-job: x86_64-msvc*
try-job: x86_64-mingw*
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Sep 11, 2025

💔 Test for 26d8112 failed: CI. Failed jobs:

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@bors2 try

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
minimal dirfd implementation (1/4)

try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: dist-various*
try-job: test-various*
try-job: x86_64-msvc*
try-job: x86_64-mingw*
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-msvc-1 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
failures:

---- fs::tests::test_dir_read_file stdout ----

thread 'fs::tests::test_dir_read_file' (5072) panicked at library\std\src\fs\tests.rs:2251:17:
dir.open_file("foo.txt") failed with: The parameter is incorrect. (os error 87)
stack backtrace:
   0: __rustc::rust_begin_unwind
   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
   2: <std::ffi::os_str::Display as core::fmt::Debug>::fmt
   3: test::convert_benchmarks_to_tests
---

error: test failed, to rerun pass `-p std --lib`
Bootstrap failed while executing `test --stage 2 --skip=compiler --skip=src`
Build completed unsuccessfully in 1:57:06
make: *** [Makefile:112: ci-msvc-py] Error 1
  local time: Thu Sep 11 21:02:03 CUT 2025
  network time: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 21:02:03 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 2.
Post job cleanup.
[command]"C:\Program Files\Git\bin\git.exe" version

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Sep 11, 2025

💔 Test for d36ef83 failed: CI. Failed jobs:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
O-windows Operating system: Windows S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants