-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create codecov.yml #80
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new configuration section in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #80 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 12.33% 12.33%
=======================================
Files 17 17
Lines 1573 1573
Branches 33 33
=======================================
Hits 194 194
Misses 1365 1365
Partials 14 14 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
codecov: | ||
status: | ||
flags: | ||
yes: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review and expand the Codecov configuration
The current configuration appears to be minimal and potentially incorrect:
- The purpose of setting
flags.yes
totrue
is unclear. Codecov flags are typically used to group coverage reports, not as boolean settings. - This configuration doesn't align with standard Codecov usage. The Codecov documentation doesn't mention a
yes
flag in this context.
Consider reviewing the Codecov documentation and expanding this configuration with standard Codecov settings. For example:
codecov:
require_ci_to_pass: yes
notify:
wait_for_ci: yes
coverage:
precision: 2
round: down
range: "70...100"
parsers:
gcov:
branch_detection:
conditional: yes
loop: yes
method: no
macro: no
comment:
layout: "reach,diff,flags,tree"
behavior: default
require_changes: no
Would you like assistance in creating a more comprehensive Codecov configuration tailored to your project's needs?
Summary by CodeRabbit