Skip to content

Add FlexibleType support for scaladoc #23320

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 29, 2025

Conversation

2m
Copy link
Contributor

@2m 2m commented Jun 5, 2025

Scala Tooling Spree PR. //cc @KacperFKorban

Fixes #22761

@2m 2m marked this pull request as draft June 5, 2025 16:51
…caladoc

AFAIK FlexibleTypes will only be visible under -Yexplicit-nulls as
inferred types. This doesn't fit with the current infrastructure of
scaladoc tests (that require explicit type annotations for tested
members). For such a simple fix, it isn't worth the effort to modify the
testing infrastructure.
@KacperFKorban KacperFKorban marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 09:15
@KacperFKorban KacperFKorban requested a review from tgodzik July 29, 2025 09:15
Copy link
Contributor

@tgodzik tgodzik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@tgodzik tgodzik merged commit 3646e8f into scala:main Jul 29, 2025
43 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Types unhandled by the scaladoc TASTy types support
3 participants