-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide a reason for not acceptable server request rejections #2607
Open
david-perez
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
davidpz/provide-a-reason-for-not-acceptable-server-request-rejections
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ | |
*/ | ||
|
||
use crate::response::IntoResponse; | ||
use http::HeaderValue; | ||
use thiserror::Error; | ||
|
||
// This is used across different protocol-specific `rejection` modules. | ||
|
@@ -24,6 +25,13 @@ pub enum MissingContentTypeReason { | |
}, | ||
} | ||
|
||
// This is used across different protocol-specific `rejection` modules. | ||
#[derive(Debug, Error)] | ||
pub enum NotAcceptableReason { | ||
#[error("cannot satisfy any of `Accept` header values: {0:?}")] | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We shouldn't log values |
||
CannotSatisfyAcceptHeaders(Vec<HeaderValue>), | ||
} | ||
|
||
pub mod any_rejections { | ||
//! This module hosts enums, up to size 8, which implement [`IntoResponse`] when their variants implement | ||
//! [`IntoResponse`]. | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Side note: I feel like this conversion can be done in a
static
once_cell::Lazy
outside of this function, then we pass the&Mime
into this function instead. That way we're not doing it over and over.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked at
Mime::parse
and it appears to be a non-negligible process, so puttingMime
behind aOnceCell
and incurring an atomic read should indeed speed things up.I also learnt that
mime
is not actively maintained, and stumbled uponmediatype
, which is const-constructible, so for our static mime type coming from the sSDK I think it would make more sense to switch to that. It's also zero-copy, so parsing the request'sAccept
andContent-Type
headers' mime types and performing the type + subtype equality check should be faster.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds like a plan
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the first part: #2629
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#2629 is throwaway work if we switch away from
mime
. I've opened #2666 to track that.