-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 750
Fixing state_db not having delete_field attribute causing a crash when DPUs in bad state #4064
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+42
−8
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4dab08f
fixing state_db not having delete_field attribute causing a crash whe…
rameshraghupathy 8ee9b1c
Addressed copilot review comment
rameshraghupathy 0732d9b
Addressed copilot review comment
rameshraghupathy d0b102f
Addressed a test case test_delete_field to cover the newly added code
rameshraghupathy 6ae9fb4
Fixed SA errors
rameshraghupathy d5cf771
Addressing review comments
rameshraghupathy fe12399
Addressing review comments
rameshraghupathy fc01643
Addressing review comments
rameshraghupathy File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we use the same redis sonic dbconnector abstraction to delete https://github.com/rameshraghupathy/sonic-utilities/blob/fc016432a4d79dbb9eebd31f7f008759dc737122/config/chassis_modules.py#L85
Since we are using the db connector abstractions for the other two functions
https://github.com/rameshraghupathy/sonic-utilities/blob/fc016432a4d79dbb9eebd31f7f008759dc737122/config/chassis_modules.py#L28
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gpunathilell Thank you for the suggestion about using the database connector abstraction consistently. While I agree this would improve consistency, this logic is currently undergoing broader refactoring in PRs #4031 and related PRs across sonic-platform-common, sonic-host-services, and sonic-platform-daemons. To avoid conflicts and duplicated effort, I believe the database access pattern consistency should be addressed as part of that broader refactoring work rather than making incremental changes here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since refactoring will be done, please do not resolve the review comments, I will approve as this is blocking bug fix. Thank you