docs: shared in-memory ABI (plain interchange form)#18
Performance Regression: -4.17%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 27 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 2 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | WallTime | decompress_all[12] |
753.6 µs | 891.2 µs | -15.44% |
| ❌ | WallTime | decompress_all[16] |
775.1 µs | 888.4 µs | -12.75% |
| ❌ | WallTime | decompress_all[("o_comment", 12)] |
15.2 ms | 17.1 ms | -10.66% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | train_and_compress[("l_comment", 12)] |
469.9 ms | 422.6 ms | +11.2% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | train_and_compress[("o_comment", 12)] |
392.1 ms | 355.6 ms | +10.25% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing docs/in-memory-abi (1766c09) with develop (cb4ea96)
Footnotes
-
2 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩