Skip to content

docs(catalog): add Sprites integration - #5048

Open
aezell wants to merge 2 commits into
strands-agents:mainfrom
aezell:alex/strands-sprites-catalog
Open

aezell wants to merge 2 commits into
strands-agents:mainfrom
aezell:alex/strands-sprites-catalog

Conversation

@aezell

@aezell aezell commented Oct 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Integration submission

Package name: strands-sprites (Python 0.1.1)
Integration type: integration
Languages published: Python
GitHub repo: https://github.com/superfly/strands-sprites
What it does: Makes persistent Sprites Linux environments available to Strands agents through the standard sandbox shell and file-editor tools. Listing the published extension helps users discover this sandbox option.
Relationship to service: Official vendor integration maintained by Fly.io (superfly); maintainedBy: partner.
Docs link included: https://github.com/superfly/strands-sprites#readme

Submitter checklist

Package

  • This is a reusable integration (library/plugin/provider), not an example agent or application built with Strands
  • Published to PyPI and/or npm under the exact package name in my entry (registry links are derived from it) — or this is a guide-only entry (no package in any language block) with a docsUrl pointing at the vendor's Strands guide
  • GitHub repository is public and includes a license

Entry

  • Description accurately states what the package does in one sentence
  • integrationType matches what the package actually is
  • All URLs are working (github, and docsUrl if set)
  • addedDate is set to today (the date I opened this PR)
  • featured and badges are left unset — those are granted by the Strands team

Docs (only if setting a docsUrl)

  • The linked page documents using this integration with Strands Agents

Conduct

  • I am the package maintainer, or I have the maintainer's explicit consent to list it
  • Entry uses the package's real name with no trademark misuse

For reviewers

  • Package installs cleanly and imports without error against the current SDK release (guide-only entries: the docsUrl guide's setup steps work instead)
  • Description matches what the package's README says it does
  • No existing catalog entry for this package (site/src/content/catalog/)
  • All URLs are reachable and resolve to the expected destinations
  • addedDate matches the submission date and featured/badges are unset (CI labels the PR catalog: editorial-review if a non-maintainer sets them)
  • The docsUrl page (if set) is a real Strands integration guide, not a generic product page

Catalog entry and PR description generated by Codex at the maintainer’s request.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the catalog: editorial-review Editorial catalog fields changed by a non-maintainer label Oct 9, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Catalog review flags

Partner maintainer tier claimed

This PR adds or removes maintainedBy: partner on: site/src/content/catalog/strands-sprites.yaml.

That tier means the integration is vended and supported by the company
behind it. Before merging, a maintainer must verify the entry's github
org is the official org of that company (and its packages are published
by them) — an integration published from a personal account stays
community regardless of what it integrates.

This is a heads-up for reviewers — it does not block merging.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the documentation Documentation changes, improvements, additions, content updates, site improvements, examples, guides label Oct 9, 2026
@yonib05

yonib05 commented Oct 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for the submission, @aezell. The entry looks good and strands-sprites installs cleanly against the current strands-agents release. Is this ready for review? If so, please mark it ready (or let us know if you're waiting on something) and we can merge.

@aezell
aezell marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2026 02:55
@aezell
aezell requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2026 02:55
@aezell
aezell requested a review from arielnabavian October 16, 2026 02:55
@aezell

aezell commented Oct 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@yonib05 Thanks for taking a look. It was just my oversight that it wasn’t marked ready for review. It’s good to go now.

This branch is waiting to be deployed

1 waiting deployment
manual-approval — 95b67ef8 Waiting Oct 14, 2026 by arielnabavian via Build and Deploy Preview #2695
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

catalog: editorial-review Editorial catalog fields changed by a non-maintainer documentation Documentation changes, improvements, additions, content updates, site improvements, examples, guides

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants