Skip to content
Open
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
91 changes: 87 additions & 4 deletions TSPL.docc/ReferenceManual/Declarations.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2264,10 +2264,8 @@ to synchronous functions,
but not to asynchronous functions.

Actors can also have nonisolated members,
whose declarations are marked with the `nonisolated` keyword.
A nonisolated member executes like code outside of the actor:
It can't interact with any of the actor's isolated state,
and callers don't mark it with `await` when using it.
whose declarations are marked with the `nonisolated` keyword
as described in <doc:Declarations#Declaration-Modifiers>.

Members of an actor can be marked with the `@objc` attribute
only if they are nonisolated or asynchronous.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3811,6 +3809,91 @@ that introduces the declaration.
For an example of how to use the `lazy` modifier,
see <doc:Properties#Lazy-Stored-Properties>.

- term `nonisolated`:
Apply this modifier to a declaration
to place it outside any actor's concurrency domain.
This modifier suppresses any implicit isolation
to the main actor or another global actor.
Nonisolated functions can run on any actor,
and nonisolated variables and properties
are accessible from code running on any actor.
<!--
XXX TR: Is there a meaningful difference here between
"on any actor" vs "on the shared thread pool"?
Or would this be clearer as explained in contrast to "isolation",
as defined in the new section in the Concurrency chapter?
-->

<!--
XXX TR: Are there any declarations you can't mark nonisolated?
The SE proposal says "all type and protocol declarations".
It seems like "nonisolated actor" wouldn't make sense, for example,
but this compiles: nonisolated actor A { }
-->

Nonisolated methods and nonisolated computed properties
can't directly access any actor-isolated state;
they use `await` like code outside the actor.
When you mark a method or property `nonisolated`,
code that calls or accesses it don't mark use `await`.
This can be a first step towards adopting concurrency,
by marking code that you want to move off of the main actor
and then using the compiler errors to guide refactoring.

On a structure, class, or enumeration declaration,
`nonisolated` applies to that type and its members,
but not to any nested type declarations.

On a protocol declaration,
`nonisolated` suppresses any inferred global-actor isolation,
which allows conforming types to be either actor-isolated or nonisolated.

```swift
// Explicitly isolated to the main actor.
@MainActor protocol SomeProtocol

// Implicitly isolated to the main actor.
protocol MyProtocol: SomeProtocol
struct MyStruct: SomeProtocol

// Not isolated to the main actor.
nonisolated protocol AnotherProtocol: SomeProtocol
nonisolated struct AnotherStruct: SomeProtocol
```

On an extension,
`nonisolated` applies to each declaration in the extension.

Nonsendable stored properties are nonisolated by default;
however, you can write this modifier to be explicit.
<!--
XXX TR:
I'm not sure the above is correct.
Does this also apply to nonsendable variables?
Any context where you'd be overriding an inferred isolation?
-->
<!-- XXX Add an upcoming feature flag note;
the code example from the SE proposal compiles
only when you have approachable concurrency turned on.

class NonSendable { }
class MyClass {
nonisolated var x: NonSendable = NonSendable()
}
-->

Sendable variables and properties are nonisolated by default,
when you access them within the same module.
<!-- XXX TR: What defines "value type" in this context? -->

<!-- TODO: Expand the above with the more specific rules from SE-0434. -->

You can't write `nonisolated` on a declaration
that's also marked with `@MainActor`
or isolated to another global actor,
on a sendable type's property if that property's type isn't sendable,
or on a sendable class's stored property if that property is mutable.

- term `optional`:
Apply this modifier to a protocol's property, method,
or subscript members to indicate that a conforming type isn't required
Expand Down