Provide additional explanation for the Windows signal handling stuff. #1182
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This PR updates a comment in our Windows-specific signal handling code for exit tests to clarify _why_ we call `_exit()` rather than `exit()`. It also switches from `_Exit()` to `_exit()` (although on Windows, they are synonymous.)
grynspan
requested review from
briancroom,
stmontgomery and
suzannaratcliff
as code owners
grynspan
added
documentation
Contributor
Author
|
@swift-ci test |
Contributor
Author
|
Self-reviewing. This is a change to a comment and the one code change is a no-op. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR updates a comment in our Windows-specific signal handling code for exit tests to clarify why we call
_exit()rather thanexit(). It also switches from_Exit()to_exit()(although on Windows, they are synonymous.)Checklist: