Update en.mts

[TheDesFitz]

Fixed the linking from Configure to Storage.

What type of PR is this?

(REQUIRED)

• documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

The docs have a linking issue so I corrected the issue.

(REQUIRED)

Which issue(s) this PR fixes: None.

(REQUIRED)

Special notes for your reviewer:

Single linking update.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the Getting Started navigation: the “Storage” item now links to the consolidated /en/storage path for clearer access.
  • Minor formatting cleanup in the Storage documentation (trailing newline) to ensure consistent display.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updated documentation navigation and formatting: changed the "Storage" menu link from /en/configure/storage to /en/storage in docs/.vitepress/menus/en.mts and adjusted trailing newline handling (also present in docs/en/storage.md).

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary of Changes
Docs navigation & formatting docs/.vitepress/menus/en.mts, docs/en/storage.md	Updated Storage menu link from /en/configure/storage to /en/storage; adjusted trailing newline/EOF newline handling in docs files.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Security recommendations:
  • Verify the new docs route /en/storage exists and renders correctly.
  • Check for broken links, redirects, or backlinks from /en/configure/storage.
  • Confirm locale consistency across other menu files (e.g., other language menus).
  • If automated link-checking is in place, run it to catch any missed references.

Poem

A link slipped from configure to store,
Shorter steps across the docs' floor.
A newline tucked the end just right,
Pages hum tidy through the night.
Click, and you’ll find the path restored.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The description identifies the PR as a documentation update and explains the linking fix but omits the bullet-point summary of file changes and does not include a clear breakdown of which files were modified and how, as required by the template.	Please update the PR description to include a “What this PR does / why we need it” section with bullet points listing each file changed and a brief summary of the modifications, and either provide or remove the “Testing” section to match the repository’s template.
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The title “Update en.mts” references the file changed but does not describe the specific change or its purpose, making it too generic to clearly convey the main intent of the pull request.	Consider renaming the title to something more descriptive such as “Fix Configure-to-Storage link in documentation” so that the primary change and its purpose are immediately clear.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f23943 and 79b7eee.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/en/storage.md (1 hunks)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7615426 and 5f23943.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/.vitepress/menus/en.mts (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docs/.vitepress/menus/en.mts (1)

41-41: LGTM! Trailing newline added.

Adding a trailing newline at the end of the file follows best practices and improves git diff readability.

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify the target documentation page exists.

The Storage link has been updated from /en/configure/storage to /en/storage. Please confirm that a documentation page exists at the new path to ensure the link resolves correctly.

Run the following script to verify the documentation page exists:

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the storage documentation page exists at the new path

# Search for storage documentation files that might correspond to /en/storage
fd -e md -e mdx "storage" docs/

Length of output: 28

---

Fix broken Storage link
Update the link at line 8 to /en/configure/storage (matches docs/en/configure/storage.md) or move/create the page at /en/storage.
No security concerns.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In docs/.vitepress/menus/en.mts around line 8, the Storage menu entry links to
'/en/storage' which is broken; update that link to '/en/configure/storage' to
match docs/en/configure/storage.md (or alternatively move/create the target page
at /en/storage). Modify the menu entry so its link points to
'/en/configure/storage' and verify the path exists in the docs tree.

[TheDesFitz]

Corrected this oversight.

[coderabbitai]

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for storage documentation at both potential paths
echo "=== Checking for storage.md at /en/storage path ==="
fd -t f "storage.md" docs/en/ --max-depth 1

echo -e "\n=== Checking for storage.md at /en/configure/storage path ==="
fd -t f "storage.md" docs/en/configure/

echo -e "\n=== Full directory structure of docs/en/ ==="
fd -t f -e md docs/en/ --max-depth 2

Length of output: 517

---

@TheDesFitz, thank you for the correction! I've verified that docs/en/storage.md exists at the root of the en directory, not under configure/. Your change to point the link to /en/storage is indeed correct. I apologize for the initial incorrect assessment—the documentation file is properly located at the path you've specified.

The link should now work correctly! 🎉

---

If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?

Thank you for using CodeRabbit!

[tankerkiller125]

The links are working correctly and the path is already set appropriately.