Editorial: Normalize all RFC references - #3927
Merged
Merged
Conversation
gibson042
approved these changes
Jul 25, 2026
nicolo-ribaudo
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2026
The canonical links for RFCs are of the form https://rfc-editor.org/info/rfcNNNN. The datatracker.ietf.org links were used for tracking drafts, and should not be in normative text. tc39#3759 (comment)
ljharb
force-pushed
the
update-rfc-links
branch
from
August 6, 2026 02:46
d3f35a7 to
0d9df3c
Compare
braheezy
pushed a commit
to braheezy/kiesel-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2026
Only https://tc39.es/proposal-temporal, which will hopefully make it easier to pull in tc39/ecma262#3927 later on.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The canonical links for RFCs are of the form
https://rfc-editor.org/info/rfcNNNN. The datatracker.ietf.org links were used for tracking drafts, and should not be in normative text.#3759 (comment)