-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Issue feat: Processing course /content issue on cms #2968
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
rushi-tekdi
merged 4 commits into
tekdi:release-1.16.0-prod-fix
from
AkshataKatwal16:release-1.16.0-prod-fix
May 21, 2026
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5f3b9ca
Issue feat: Processing course /content issue on cms
AkshataKatwal16 e2131b1
update pr
AkshataKatwal16 c732a20
Merge branch 'release-1.16.0-prod-fix' of github.com:tekdi/pratham2.0…
AkshataKatwal16 85484ce
Issue feat: Add action iscon for republish for processing content
AkshataKatwal16 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current implementation introduces several issues that should be addressed:
content?.status === 'Processing', the code executes arouter.pushat line 163 and then immediately proceeds to evaluate the ternary operator at line 165, which triggers a secondrouter.push. This results in redundant navigation and potential race conditions in the router.console.logstatement at line 158 should be removed before merging to production.content.contentTypeis accessed without a null check, even thoughcontentis treated as potentially nullable at line 159 (content?.status).ifblock (lines 160-162) are inconsistent and hinder readability.Using an
if...else if...elsestructure resolves the double routing and improves code clarity.