Skip to content

Conversation

@evgeni
Copy link
Member

@evgeni evgeni commented Jan 22, 2025

No description provided.

@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented Jan 22, 2025

I wasn't sure about this one, do we want to drop .49 already? technically we should, as we dropped EL8 and .49 supports EL8, but…

@evgeni evgeni marked this pull request as draft January 22, 2025 07:38
@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented Jan 22, 2025

I wasn't sure about this one, do we want to drop .49 already? technically we should, as we dropped EL8 and .49 supports EL8, but…

I think we can say we're only EL9 and still 3.49 compatible if 3.49 works on EL9.

@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented Jan 23, 2025

That works for me.

Rebased the work here nevertheless, for the moment we actually drop .49

@evgeni evgeni marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2025 14:30
@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented Dec 4, 2025

it's time…

@evgeni evgeni merged commit d075f61 into master Dec 4, 2025
12 checks passed
@evgeni evgeni deleted the drop49 branch December 4, 2025 16:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants