docs: clarify implementation status in GAP_DETECTION.md#48
Merged
Conversation
Simplified gap detection documentation by: **Removed (20 lines)**: - Historical Analysis section (GET /api/v1/gaps endpoint doesn't work) - References to cross-source detection as implemented (planned) **Added Clarifications**: - Clear disclaimer at top: only duplicate work detection implemented - Marked each gap type in Overview section (✅ implemented or planned) - Note in Stage 6: gaps returned in response, not persisted - New "Future Gap Types" section clearly separated from implemented features - Updated status footer: duplicate work implemented, persistence planned **Kept (579 lines)**: - Complete 6-stage detection pipeline (accurate to implementation) - Duplicate work detection criteria and examples - Confidence and impact scoring formulas - Tuning parameters and best practices - Troubleshooting guide - All working API examples **Key Changes**: - Overview now shows: "Duplicate Work ✅ Implemented" vs others "(planned)" - Removed section on historical gap analysis (endpoint returns empty) - Moved future gap types to dedicated section at end - Added note about gap persistence being planned **Impact**: - Minimal reduction (3%) because content was already accurate - Clear separation between implemented (duplicate work) and planned features - Users understand current capabilities vs. roadmap
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Clarified what's currently implemented vs. planned in GAP_DETECTION.md. Unlike EVALUATION.md and RANKING.md, most of the content was already accurate (the detection pipeline is fully implemented), so this is a light simplification focused on removing non-working features and adding clear status indicators.
Changes Made
Removed (20 lines)
GET /api/v1/gapsendpoint which returns emptyAdded Clarifications
Clear disclaimer at top:
Gap type status in Overview:
Note in Stage 6:
New "Future Gap Types" section:
Updated status footer:
Kept (579 lines) - Accurate Content
✅ Complete 6-stage detection pipeline (all implemented)
✅ Duplicate work detection criteria and examples
✅ Confidence scoring formula and tiers
✅ Impact assessment methodology
✅ Tuning parameters (similarity threshold, temporal overlap, etc.)
✅ Best practices for using the system
✅ Comprehensive troubleshooting guide
✅ All working API examples
Why Minimal Reduction?
EVALUATION.md: 982 → 218 lines (78% reduction) - Most content was unimplemented
RANKING.md: 843 → 338 lines (60% reduction) - Many features unimplemented
GAP_DETECTION.md: 599 → 579 lines (3% reduction) - Most content was accurate
The detection pipeline (clustering, entity extraction, temporal analysis, LLM verification) is fully implemented, so most of the documentation is correct and useful.
Impact
Before: 599 lines, unclear what works vs. what's planned
After: 579 lines, clear separation of implemented vs. future features
Key Improvements:
Testing
Related PRs
Part of post-Milestone 3 documentation cleanup:
Philosophy
Unlike the other docs, GAP_DETECTION.md was already mostly accurate because the detection system is actually built. This PR focuses on: