Add utility to construct artificial interest fields from detected features

[Sven-248]

This PR handles #540 and introduces a new utility function features_to_interest_field that reconstructs an artificial interest field from a feature table (e.g. output of tobac feature detection).

The function places blobs at the detected feature positions and generates a corresponding field on a given template grid. Blob amplitude can be derived from a feature property and blob size can be estimated from feature area.

• Have you followed our guidelines in CONTRIBUTING.md?
• Have you self-reviewed your code and corrected any misspellings?
• Have you written documentation that is easy to understand?
• Have you written descriptive commit messages?
• Have you added NumPy docstrings for newly added functions?
• Have you formatted your code using black?
• If you have introduced a new functionality, have you added adequate unit tests?
• Have all tests passed in your local clone?
• If you have introduced a new functionality, have you added an example notebook?
• Have you kept your pull request small and limited so that it is easy to review?
• Have the newest changes from this branch been merged?

[github-actions]

Linting results by Pylint:

Your code has been rated at 8.36/10 (previous run: 8.37/10, -0.01)
_{The linting score is an indicator that reflects how well your code version follows Pylint’s coding standards and quality metrics with respect to the RC_v1.6.x branch.
A decrease usually indicates your new code does not fully meet style guidelines or has potential errors.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 74.60317% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 65.01%. Comparing base (8639ece) to head (fe49b39).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
tobac/utils/features_to_field.py	74.60%	16 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           RC_v1.6.x     #566      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      64.86%   65.01%   +0.14%     
=============================================
  Files             27       28       +1     
  Lines           4047     4110      +63     
=============================================
+ Hits            2625     2672      +47     
- Misses          1422     1438      +16     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	65.01% <74.60%> (+0.14%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[freemansw1]

Thanks, @Sven-248 . Can we put this on the agenda for the dev meeting Friday? I'm curious to learn more of the background on this.

Some stylistic notes:

• Please add docstrings to all these functions
• Please use typing for the parameters - I think Literal['hdim_1', 'hdim_2'], etc., would be good.

[fsenf]

Dear @Sven-248 ,

thank you for your contributions. I have been looking for more general things first.

Could you please provide an updated version of the features_to_field.py module with

• refactoring applied such that no nested functions appear
• added docstrings

This would help to dive deeper in the next step. Please re-request my review once you are ready.