Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update QUDT reference to FAIRsharing DOI #858

Closed
wants to merge 203 commits into from

Conversation

dr-shorthair
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Simon Cox and others added 30 commits September 8, 2017 10:10
* Update WGS84

* rename NIMA version to WGS84-NIMA

---------

Co-authored-by: Simon Cox <[email protected]>
* Add keys and patterns for ISO and OGC standard numbers (similar to IETF RFC numbers)

* Need to double escape backslash in JSON pattern

* Add option for /IEC as part of isoNumber

* Add ISO numbers and OGC numbers for some existing entries

* Add OMS and O&M (OGC and ISO standards)

* Added new versions of GML

* Fixed duplicated URL

* Add GeoSPARQL 1.1

* OMXML and SensorML

* Unbalanced parenthesis

* stray comma :-(

* Restructure GeoSPARQL version chain

* Update WGS84

* rename NIMA version to WGS84-NIMA

---------

Co-authored-by: Simon Cox <[email protected]>
* Fix SMIL20 aliases and overwrite rules for media-source

I'm working with @deniak on improving the data in the W3C API so that Specref
may more easily switch to the W3C API. One rippling effect is that this means
that some of the hacks done to get the right entries are no longer needed (and
now create duplicates). Adjusting the rules accordingly.

* Add updated w3c.json

(That's the result of running the W3C script. Needed for tests to pass)
@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Contributor Author

This has been approved by QUDT editors - see qudt/qudt-public-repo#1156 (comment)

Copy link
Owner

@tobie tobie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're merging lots of old commits here. May I suggest starting fork an up to date branch?

@dr-shorthair dr-shorthair marked this pull request as draft April 2, 2025 12:14
@dr-shorthair dr-shorthair closed this by deleting the head repository Apr 2, 2025
@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replaced with #859

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants