Skip to content

Revert Box Shadows changes - #231

Merged
coliff merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
dev/coliff/revert-box-shadows
Jan 16, 2026
Merged

Revert Box Shadows changes#231
coliff merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
dev/coliff/revert-box-shadows

Conversation

@coliff

@coliff coliff commented Jan 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reverts change from: #210

This was a 'breaking change' in that it was too different form the previous version. Saving the change for the next major version instead.

This was a breaking change, the change was too different.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 16, 2026 09:16

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request reverts box shadow changes from version 2.3.0 that were deemed too breaking for a minor release. The changes bump the version to 2.3.1 and restore the previous simpler box shadow values.

Changes:

  • Version bumped from 2.3.0 to 2.3.1 across all files
  • Box shadow CSS variables reverted from complex multi-layered shadows to simpler single-shadow definitions
  • Changes applied consistently across source files and generated distribution files

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 21 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
scss/mixins/_banner.scss Updated version number in banner comment to 2.3.1
scss/_root-modus.scss Reverted box shadow variables to simpler single-shadow values
package.json Updated package version to 2.3.1
package-lock.json Updated lockfile version to 2.3.1
hugo.yml Updated version references and CDN URL to 2.3.1
dist/css/*.css Regenerated distribution files with reverted box shadows and new version

@coliff
coliff merged commit 8d6ea53 into main Jan 16, 2026
21 checks passed
@coliff
coliff deleted the dev/coliff/revert-box-shadows branch January 16, 2026 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants