Skip to content

Conversation

kimichenn
Copy link
Contributor

@kimichenn kimichenn commented Oct 10, 2025

Closes #11

Don't merge until we're done with the corresponding obc and gcs changes

@kimichenn kimichenn marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2025 00:21
Copy link
Contributor

@AskewParity AskewParity left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this, this does simplify our protos a lot. However, I think there are still lingering redundancies that could provide confusion down the road.

Chris = 2;
Daniel = 3;
enum AirdropType {
Undefined = 0;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After some thought, I'd cut this --> I don't want to be checking for undefined everytime I use this type.

message Airdrop {
AirdropIndex Index = 1; // Unique ID
ODLCObjects Object = 2; // Unique Target
AirdropType Index = 1; // Unique ID
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems redundant with AirdropType, now that they are single, unique objects.

*/
message AirdropSwap {
AirdropIndex index = 1;
AirdropType index = 1;
Copy link
Contributor

@AskewParity AskewParity Oct 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we want to break stuff

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a mandatory change, or else protos just wont compile because we dont have airdropindex anymore.

Copy link
Contributor

@AskewParity AskewParity Oct 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry, I mean the entire type looks redundant. My bad, do we want to break stuff refers to deleting this.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, we can nuke this. ill just check the references for this from gcs and obc

@kimichenn kimichenn merged commit 145b7ff into master Oct 19, 2025
@kimichenn kimichenn deleted the feat/cv-stuff branch October 19, 2025 21:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Airdrop Protobuf

2 participants