Fix noexcept specification in qsbr_thread::make_qsbr_thread#805
Conversation
WalkthroughTightened forwarding and refined noexcept on the per-thread QSBR start lambda in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant Main
participant QSBR as qsbr_thread::make_qsbr_thread
participant Worker as thread lambda
participant F as f2
Main->>QSBR: create thread with callable + args
QSBR->>Worker: start thread (lambda captures `a2`...)
Worker->>F: call f2(std::forward<decltype(a2)>(a2)...)
note right of Worker `#D6EAF8`: lambda noexcept = noexcept(noexcept(f2(...)))\n(test conditional on UNODB_DETAIL_WITH_STATS)
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🧰 Additional context used🧬 Code graph analysis (2)test/test_qsbr.cpp (1)
qsbr.hpp (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
754567c to
057a5b8
Compare
Add some missing noexcept specifiers.
057a5b8 to
787327e
Compare
|



Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.