Skip to content

Conversation

0ddAuto00
Copy link

@0ddAuto00 0ddAuto00 commented May 29, 2025

Issue #4

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Verdicts for each claim are now displayed with emoji labels for clearer results.
    • Each claim and its verdict are shown in separate, clearly named steps for improved readability.
  • Style

    • Progress updates now use a clearer separator for better visual distinction.
  • Chores

    • Minor update to the initial progress message formatting.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 29, 2025

Walkthrough

The code introduces a helper function to map verdict texts to emoji-labeled verdict strings. It modifies the way progress and verdict results are displayed by using asynchronous steps for each claim-verdict pair, updating their outputs individually. Minor formatting changes are made to progress messages and evidence presentation.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
app.py Added get_verdict_value function; switched verdict display to per-claim asynchronous steps; updated progress message formatting and evidence output.

Poem

🥕
A helper now maps verdicts with flair,
Emoji verdicts float in the air!
Each claim gets a step, so neat and so bright,
Progress now sparkles with formatting right.
The rabbit applauds this hopping advance—
Fact-checking with style, and a touch of romance!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app.py (1)

8-18: Add docstring to the helper function.

The get_verdict_value function logic is correct and provides a clean mapping from verdict text to emoji-labeled strings. However, it's missing a docstring as flagged by static analysis.

 def get_verdict_value(verdict_text):
+    """Map verdict text to emoji-labeled verdict string.
+    
+    Args:
+        verdict_text (str): The raw verdict text ("true", "partially true", "false", etc.)
+        
+    Returns:
+        str: Emoji-labeled verdict string
+    """
     match verdict_text:
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)

8-8: Missing docstring in public function

(D103)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 56f3e01 and bf09795.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
app.py (1)
src/verifact_manager.py (1)
  • VerifactManager (37-187)
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
app.py

1-1: pandas imported but unused

Remove unused import: pandas

(F401)


8-8: Missing docstring in public function

(D103)


20-20: Missing docstring in public function

(D103)


46-46: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


58-58: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


68-68: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


71-71: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


77-77: Missing docstring in public function

(D103)

🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
app.py

[warning] 1-1: app.py#L1
Unused pandas imported as pd

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (4)
app.py (4)

21-21: Minor formatting improvement looks good.

The change from "Starting fact-checking pipeline..." to "Starting fact-checking pipeline:" provides better visual consistency when progress updates are appended.


27-27: Progress separator improvement enhances readability.

The addition of the em dash (" —") separator makes the progress updates more visually distinct and readable.


45-71: Excellent improvement to user experience with interactive steps.

The refactoring from a single accumulated response to individual async steps for each claim significantly improves the user interface by:

  1. Making each claim-verdict pair interactive and expandable
  2. Providing clear visual separation between claims
  3. Using the get_verdict_value helper to display emoji-labeled verdicts in step titles

The implementation correctly handles the evidence formatting and maintains all the original information display while enhancing the presentation.

However, there are some formatting issues to clean up:

-
-            
 claim_title = f"Claim {idx+1}: {claim_text} \u2014 Verdict: {get_verdict_value(verdict_text)}"
-
 async with cl.Step(name=claim_title, type="system") as step:
     # Evidence formatting
     if evidence:
         evidence_str = "\n".join([
             f"- {getattr(ev, 'content', str(ev))} (Source: {getattr(ev, 'source', 'N/A')}, Stance: {getattr(ev, 'stance', 'N/A')}, Relevance: {getattr(ev, 'relevance', 'N/A')})"
             for ev in evidence
         ])
     else:
         evidence_str = "No evidence found."
-        
     step.output = (
         f"\n---\n**Claim {idx+1}:** {claim_text}\n"
         f"**Evidence:**\n{evidence_str}\n"
         f"\n**Verdict:** {verdict_text}\n"
         f"**Confidence:** {confidence}\n"
         f"**Explanation:** {explanation}\n"
         f"**Sources:**\n{sources_str}\n"
     )
     await step.update()
-                
 progress_msg.content = ""
 await progress_msg.update()
-                
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)

46-46: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


58-58: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


68-68: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


71-71: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


78-78: Welcome message enhancement looks good.

The emoji addition makes the welcome message more friendly and visually appealing.

@@ -1,18 +1,30 @@
import pandas as pd
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove unused import.

The pandas import is not used anywhere in the file and should be removed to clean up the codebase.

-import pandas as pd
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
import pandas as pd
// (The import `pandas as pd` has been removed; no further changes needed here.)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)

1-1: pandas imported but unused

Remove unused import: pandas

(F401)

🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

[warning] 1-1: app.py#L1
Unused pandas imported as pd

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In app.py at line 1, the pandas import is unused and should be removed to clean
up the code. Delete the line importing pandas from the file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant