Skip to content

vtgate: expand qualified stars without JOIN USING coalescing - #20759

Open
GrahamCampbell wants to merge 1 commit into
vitessio:mainfrom
GrahamCampbell:qualified-star-join-using-expansion
Open

vtgate: expand qualified stars without JOIN USING coalescing#20759
GrahamCampbell wants to merge 1 commit into
vitessio:mainfrom
GrahamCampbell:qualified-star-join-using-expansion

Conversation

@GrahamCampbell

@GrahamCampbell GrahamCampbell commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description

The early rewriter applies JOIN USING coalescing to qualified stars. MySQL coalesces the join columns for an unqualified * only: tbl.* returns every column of the named table, join columns included, so select r.* from t l join t r using (col1) returns three columns on MySQL but two on Vitess, silently dropping r.col1 from the results. The right-hand side of the join loses its join columns; the left-hand side keeps them, so the wrong shape only shows on one side.

The fix clears the coalescing state when the star carries a qualifier, before the expander runs. Unqualified stars keep the existing coalesced expansion and ordering unchanged, pinned by the existing cases. Four new expansion cases cover both join sides, a mixed qualified pair, and a second table shape, and a planner golden pins the emitted SQL end to end; that file runs in the plan e2e suite, so CI compares the corrected expansion against MySQL directly.

This came out of reviewing #20633, whose declared-column-list validation turns the wrong expansion into a spurious VT03033 for select a from (select r.* from t l join t r using (col1)) x(a, b, c). The validation change now stacks on this fix. Since the wrong column set is returned to clients on current releases, this is probably worth backporting.

Related Issue(s)

Found while addressing review feedback on #20633.

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Qualified stars in queries with JOIN USING now expand to every column of the named table, matching MySQL: previously the join columns were omitted from the right-hand table's tbl.* expansion, and results silently differed from MySQL. No migrations or configuration changes.

AI Disclosure

This PR was written primarily by Fable.


graph LR
    subgraph json [JSON support]
        direction TB
        PR20625["#20625 (merged)<br>mysql/json: fix MarshalTo discarding accumulated output for nested blob and bit values"]
        PR20632["#20632<br>vtgate: preserve IN value lists in complex aggregate projections"]
        PRA["#20691<br>evalengine: disable the static IN hash table for JSON operands"]
        PR20682["#20682 (draft)<br>evalengine: support constant-folded JSON values as literals"]
        PR20683["#20683 (draft)<br>evalengine, sqlparser: MySQL comparison domains; nested BETWEEN parentheses"]
        PR20626["#20626 (draft)<br>vtgate: support cross-shard JSON_ARRAYAGG and JSON_OBJECTAGG"]
        PR20625 --> PR20682
        PRA --> PR20682
        PR20682 --> PR20683
        PR20632 --> PR20626
        PR20683 --> PR20626
    end

    subgraph union [Union routing]
        direction TB
        PR20628["#20628<br>vtgate: track per-source copies of pushed join predicates so merges skip them"]
        PR20629["#20629<br>vtgate: fix None routing handling when merging unions"]
        PR20630["#20630 (draft)<br>vtgate: merge unions on join-predicate-free routings when all sources agree"]
        PR20755["#20755<br>vtgate: fix union merging through reference-table alternates"]
        PR20756["#20756 (draft)<br>vtgate: merge empty reference branches through rewritten copies"]
        PR20628 --> PR20630
        PR20629 --> PR20630
        PR20630 --> PR20756
        PR20755 --> PR20756
    end

    subgraph cte [Recursive CTEs]
        direction TB
        PR20759["#20759<br>vtgate: expand qualified stars without JOIN USING coalescing"]
        PR20633["#20633 (draft)<br>vtgate: validate the declared column list length of CTEs and derived tables"]
        PR20631["#20631 (draft)<br>vtgate: bind recursive CTE column filters as arguments in unmerged term queries"]
        PR20759 --> PR20633
        PR20633 --> PR20631
    end

    json ~~~ union ~~~ cte
Loading

Signed-off-by: Graham Campbell <hello@gjcampbell.co.uk>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 29, 2026 21:47

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the v25.0.0 milestone Jul 29, 2026
@vitess-bot vitess-bot Bot added NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Jul 29, 2026
@vitess-bot

vitess-bot Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Component: VTGate NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants