Skip to content

[RELEASE] An Improve signal can be investigated, not just browsed away from (carries #6462) - #6468

Merged
vivekchand merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-6462
Oct 17, 2026
Merged

vivekchand merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-6462

Conversation

@vivekchand

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Releases #6462, merged as e8c2269: an Improve signal can be investigated instead of browsed away from.

What this ships

Every guidance candidate on the Improve tab, and the review dialog's primary action, now offers Investigate. It opens the Assistant on a new conversation with a question built from that card's own evidence, and submits it through the composer's own path so every guard a typed question gets still applies. The action it replaces, "Open Setup", switched tabs and stopped.

Verified live before the merge on the local dashboard against this machine's own 28 candidates, from both a card and the review dialog. The Assistant answered from the two real Codex sessions behind the signal, naming the recorded commands and their failures.

FLYWHEEL rules recorded here

Both paid for in the session that shipped #6462:

  • Your own open PRs count as claims. The handoff was built browser-side while draft feat(improve): explain a signal with Assistant and plan prevention #6351 had been carrying a server-side version of the same handoff since 2026-10-05, and the overlap surfaced only after CI went green. Twice in three days now. gh pr list --search "<module>" goes before the worktree, not after the green run. feat(improve): explain a signal with Assistant and plan prevention #6351 runs the candidate excerpts through clawmetry/redaction.py first; the version that shipped does not, which is the open gap.
  • An action that only changes tabs is a dead end. "Open Setup" passed every test, because switching tabs is exactly what it was asked to do. The reader's words were "i've no idea what to do either". Press the primary button as someone who has not read the diff and ask what question it just answered.

Product record

https://factory.8090.ai/project/b415065f-ab2f-4f53-8864-0c009fd098cb/requirements/75d07ea2-7c43-429f-b70e-e91840841006

REQ-ASSIST-010. Criteria AC-ASSIST-010.1 through .6 shipped mirrored into docs/acceptance_criteria.json and cited from tests/test_improve_investigate.py in #6462.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…y from (carries #6462)

Ships #6462: every guidance candidate on the Improve tab, and the review
dialog's primary action, now offers Investigate. It opens the Assistant on a
new conversation with a question built from that card's own evidence, and
submits it through the composer's own path so every guard a typed question
gets still applies. The action it replaces, "Open Setup", switched tabs and
stopped.

Also records two rules in FLYWHEEL.md, both paid for in this session:

- your own open PRs count as claims: the handoff was built browser-side while
  draft #6351 had carried a server-side version since 2026-10-05, and the
  overlap surfaced only after CI went green. #6351 redacts the candidate
  excerpts first; the shipped version does not.
- an action that only changes tabs is a dead end, and it passes every test,
  because switching tabs is what it was asked to do. Walk the surface as a
  reader who has not read the diff.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@8090-software-factory

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Drift Bot (ClawMetry): no drift detected

Drift Bot analyzed the changed files against this project's blueprints and requirements and found no drift.

@vivekchand
vivekchand merged commit 5572c21 into main Oct 17, 2026
49 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant