Implement LIKE in vortex instead of falling back to arrow by robert3005 · Pull Request #8709 · vortex-data/vortex

3 benchmarks regressed

⚡ 8 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1619 untouched benchmarks
🆕 7 new benchmarks
⏩ 42 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(1000, 10)]`	154.6 µs	189.6 µs	-18.48%
❌	Simulation	`slice_empty_vortex`	339.4 ns	397.8 ns	-14.66%
❌	Simulation	`compact[(4096, 90)]`	779.7 ns	867.2 ns	-10.09%
⚡	Simulation	`rebuild_naive`	105.8 µs	91.3 µs	+15.89%
⚡	Simulation	`bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128]`	215.3 ns	186.1 ns	+15.67%
⚡	Simulation	`chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(100, 100)]`	307 µs	272.1 µs	+12.82%
⚡	Simulation	`bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024]`	275.6 ns	246.4 ns	+11.84%
⚡	Simulation	`chunked_varbinview_opt_canonical_into[(100, 100)]`	340.5 µs	305.5 µs	+11.44%
⚡	Simulation	`encode_varbin[(1000, 8)]`	160.7 µs	144.7 µs	+11.02%
⚡	Simulation	`encode_varbin[(1000, 4)]`	159 µs	144.1 µs	+10.37%
⚡	Simulation	`chunked_varbinview_opt_into_canonical[(100, 100)]`	389.7 µs	353.8 µs	+10.15%
🆕	Simulation	`ilike_contains`	N/A	782.1 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`like_contains`	N/A	155.3 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`like_exact`	N/A	43.2 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`like_per_row_patterns`	N/A	167.4 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`like_prefix`	N/A	50 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`like_regex`	N/A	623.3 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`like_suffix`	N/A	65.3 µs	N/A

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing rk/native-like (436e600) with develop (2a58c67)}

42 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩