Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: example is added with a server written in Go #2962

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AndrusGerman
Copy link

@AndrusGerman AndrusGerman commented Oct 10, 2019

Reason for the proposal:

Because different servers already support golang. I think it's a good idea to add golang as an example.

why gorilla/mux:

Since it complies with the net / http standards of golang. It has no conflicts with the standard library

The code (Golang) has been verified and works correctly.

What exactly did you modify?

These changes only include modifications to the 'history-mode.md' files. Adding the example of a server in Go

Did you implement the example in all languages?

Yes

Notes

I previously created a pull request #2961, but the implementation was not complete and created a new pull request.

@AndrusGerman AndrusGerman changed the title DOC: example is added with a server written in Go (history-mode) DOCS: example is added with a server written in Go (history-mode) Oct 10, 2019
If the main page calls a static file it will work. If it is not a file it will be detected as a link history mode
@anirudhmurali
Copy link

This is exactly what I wanted! I tried using this: https://github.com/ddo/go-vue-handler, but your solution works perfectly with gorilla/mux. Thanks a lot for this, wish this gets merged soon.

@posva posva changed the title DOCS: example is added with a server written in Go (history-mode) docs: example is added with a server written in Go Aug 3, 2020
@posva posva added docs need review Needs to be reviewed by someone who know about the topic labels Aug 3, 2020
@AndrusGerman
Copy link
Author

Checking my pull request list, I see that this has not been confirmed for more than 3 years, I'm willing to update it, but surely the documentation will change with respect to the original pull request.
Everything is fine?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs need review Needs to be reviewed by someone who know about the topic
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants