Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"(WWW)" in parallel structure to existing "(W3C)" in doc #189

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

celestaria
Copy link

@celestaria celestaria commented Oct 1, 2024

Add WWW to line 47. The shorthand for World Wide Web is WWW.


Preview | Diff

Add (WWW) in parenthesis's to line 49. All resources I found online state that the shorthand for the World Wide Web is WWW.
@tantek tantek added the Project Vision Vision and Principles label Oct 2, 2024
Copy link
Member

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small markup improvement suggestion

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Markup Shorthands: markdown yes

# Introduction # {#intro}

The World Wide Web was originally conceived
The World Wide Web (WWW) was originally conceived
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
The World Wide Web (WWW) was originally conceived
The World Wide Web (<abbr>WWW</abbr>) was originally conceived

@fantasai
Copy link
Contributor

fantasai commented Oct 2, 2024

We don't use the abbreviation WWW anywhere in this document, do we need to introduce it here? (What problem is it solving?)

@tantek
Copy link
Member

tantek commented Oct 3, 2024

We don't use the abbreviation WWW anywhere in this document, do we need to introduce it here? (What problem is it solving?)

I believe this may be an attempt to match the format of the opening of the next paragraph "The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) " with the W3C in parentheses, and thus helps somewhat highlight to a casual reader that WWW and W3C are related (per common prose structure) but different (explicitly different looking abbrs).

@tantek tantek changed the title Update Vision.bs "(WWW)" in parallel structure to existing "(W3C)" in doc Oct 3, 2024
@frivoal
Copy link
Contributor

frivoal commented Oct 3, 2024

Happy to defer to the editor's judgement on this one.

Copy link

@wareid wareid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved with the suggested abbreviation change.

@cwilso
Copy link
Collaborator

cwilso commented Oct 4, 2024

We DO use the term W3C in the document (around 30 times), so it makes sense to mark it. We do NOT use the acronym WWW anywhere in the document, and it makes the very first sentence of the Introduction choppier to read. I do not think this is a change we should take.

@tantek
Copy link
Member

tantek commented Oct 4, 2024

I do not think this is a change we should take.

Recognizing lack of consensus and the fact that this seems unnecessary before next publication, I suggest "defer" on this PR until after next Note publication.

@tantek
Copy link
Member

tantek commented Oct 4, 2024

per chair+editor consensus on defer, labeling defer for reconsideration after next Note publication.

@tantek tantek added the Defer Deferred to future work label Oct 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on pushback in comments from @fantasai and @cwilso I have changed my mind and no longer think we need this in the Vision (certainly not for Statement).

Propose closing this PR without changes, without prejudice for any editorial or other improvements we might make in a future version of the Vision.

@tantek tantek added Candidate to Close? and removed Defer Deferred to future work labels Feb 26, 2025
@cwilso
Copy link
Collaborator

cwilso commented Mar 6, 2025

The AB concluded (based on the above) to close this.

@cwilso cwilso closed this Mar 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants