-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"(WWW)" in parallel structure to existing "(W3C)" in doc #189
Conversation
Add (WWW) in parenthesis's to line 49. All resources I found online state that the shorthand for the World Wide Web is WWW.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small markup improvement suggestion
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Markup Shorthands: markdown yes | |||
|
|||
# Introduction # {#intro} | |||
|
|||
The World Wide Web was originally conceived | |||
The World Wide Web (WWW) was originally conceived |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The World Wide Web (WWW) was originally conceived | |
The World Wide Web (<abbr>WWW</abbr>) was originally conceived |
We don't use the abbreviation WWW anywhere in this document, do we need to introduce it here? (What problem is it solving?) |
I believe this may be an attempt to match the format of the opening of the next paragraph "The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) " with the W3C in parentheses, and thus helps somewhat highlight to a casual reader that WWW and W3C are related (per common prose structure) but different (explicitly different looking abbrs). |
Happy to defer to the editor's judgement on this one. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved with the suggested abbreviation change.
We DO use the term W3C in the document (around 30 times), so it makes sense to mark it. We do NOT use the acronym WWW anywhere in the document, and it makes the very first sentence of the Introduction choppier to read. I do not think this is a change we should take. |
Recognizing lack of consensus and the fact that this seems unnecessary before next publication, I suggest "defer" on this PR until after next Note publication. |
per chair+editor consensus on defer, labeling defer for reconsideration after next Note publication. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on pushback in comments from @fantasai and @cwilso I have changed my mind and no longer think we need this in the Vision (certainly not for Statement).
Propose closing this PR without changes, without prejudice for any editorial or other improvements we might make in a future version of the Vision.
The AB concluded (based on the above) to close this. |
Add WWW to line 47. The shorthand for World Wide Web is WWW.
Preview | Diff