Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor stakeholders and diversity section #231

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Refactor stakeholders and diversity section #231

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

cwilso
Copy link
Collaborator

@cwilso cwilso commented Jan 12, 2025

This fixes #169.

This takes a similar approach to #171, but with a much simpler approach that results in much clearer text.

  • the org size et al attributes are included as aspects of stake-holders, rather than having to split into a separate point.
  • the aspects of diversity are only mentioned at a high level, and the list is left to a reference to the CoC.

Copy link
Member

@jyasskin jyasskin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@cwilso cwilso mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2025
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Yasskin <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a big improvement. There's a few editorial nits I'd like to try improving, but can certainly wait to land this and then discuss separately if necessary.

@cwilso cwilso merged commit b9fca73 into main Jan 15, 2025
4 checks passed
Copy link

@torgo torgo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adjusting how we use "diversity" in the vision
4 participants