Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add limits to the number of router rule registration #1752
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add limits to the number of router rule registration #1752
Changes from 6 commits
013e136
9f380a1
b5a530c
b1bdb83
cfe0428
6843296
645a400
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel that the number of conditions under |orCondition| may not be counted?
e.g.
or: [{singleRule}, {singleRule}, {singleRule}]
|result| might be overwritten by the result for {singleRule} for three times, but we want |result|'s [=total count=] to be three.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe those are correctly counted? Let's walk through the current algorithm. btw, under the current design,
or: [{singleRule}, {singleRule}, {singleRule}]
, this total count is expected to be four (or
should be counted as one condition).or
condition. The total count will be one.total count
will be two, because we pass "one" astotal count
to count-router-inner-conditions in this sub-step.total count
will be incremented inside the algorithm.total count
will be three.total count
will be four.Am I missing something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Upon the sync, I understand how this works.
The last result will be the |currentResult|'s total count, and it will be passed to the coming count-router-inner-conditions. Therefore, the value will be updated like:
Therefore, even if the algorithm does not have add x + y like operation, the count will be updated.
I feel the data flow is difficult to track at once, and hope some notes to explain that as you have already noted below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've updated to set |result| to be the result of count-router-inner-conditions directly, and now we don't have to set
total count
explicitly. Hence note is not required anymore. WDYT?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe?
After reviewing this, I got familiar with the algorithm well and can easily read this like so.
However, I am not sure how people first look feel on this. Let me delegate the decision to other reviewers on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The algorithm seems pretty intuitive to me now without needing a note. It is clear that result is mutated and the for-loop over all
_or
conditions means it will be mutated once for each sub-condition.