-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
Make the reference to The Unicode Standard undated #618
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removing this means there's no link at all to this reference, and that it is the only reference in the spec without a link.
That seems like a non-ideal result. Specref doesn't have any link to 10646 that I can find. @himorin do you know if there's any other way to reference this important document? I wonder if i18n has a guide for how to reference it, for example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mean without URL?
ISO does not offer URLs to the latest edition of the standard.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As pointed during call (sorry Ive missed at that period), I also could not find any canonical pointer to the newest version of 10646. ICS does not work on this front nor search box does not change URL.
Also for character collection we refer for ja subset, I could not find any pointer within Unicode one. I haven't checked entire UTS or else, but seems missIng in Unicode. (or may have some replacement by General Category or something??)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For other specs, I suppose most of text refer Unicode but not 10646, which seems not in xref neither(??)...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you might be right. See https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode17.0.0/core-spec/appendix-c/
So maybe we can have a dated reference to a specific edition of ISO/IEC 10646 strictly for the Japanese collections.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
downloaded ISO PDF and checked about collection.
Collections are defined in normative Annex A
Collections of graphic characters for subsets, and defined collections 301 to 321 represent whole UCS, like 303 for Unicode 3.1 (detailed in Annex A.3). So, I suppose this will not be in Unicode side, but just in ISO. CJK collections, from 370, are defined in Annex A.4 subsections and refer source reference file for CJK Unified Ideographs (CJKSrc). Collections from 370 to 375 (and 380-389) are marked as fixed collection, so these will not be changed by newer edition of ISO 10646 (p2751 of 10646:2000).So, in total, I'd agree to use dated reference.