Skip to content

Do not normalize language tags in D-interpretations #96

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Do not normalize language tags in D-interpretations #96

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 8 additions & 3 deletions spec/index.html
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -882,11 +882,11 @@ <h2>D-interpretations</h2>
<tbody>
<tr><td class="semantictable">If <code>rdf:langString</code> is in D,
then for every language-tagged string E with lexical form sss and language tag ttt,
IL(E)= &lt; sss, ttt' &gt;, where ttt' is ttt converted to lower case using US-ASCII rules</td></tr>
IL(E)= &lt; sss, ttt &gt;</td></tr>
<tr><td class="semantictable">If <code>rdf:dirLangString</code> is in D,
then for every directional language-tagged string E with lexical form sss,
language tag ttt, and base direction bbb,
IL(E)= &lt; sss, ttt', bbb &gt;, where ttt' is ttt converted to lower case using US-ASCII rules</td></tr>
IL(E)= &lt; sss, ttt, bbb &gt;</td></tr>
<tr><td class="semantictable">For every other IRI aaa in D,
I(aaa) is the datatype identified by aaa, and for every literal
"sss"^^aaa, IL("sss"^^aaa) = L2V(I(aaa))(sss)</td></tr>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2281,7 +2281,12 @@ <h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
<h2>Substantive changes since RDF 1.1</h2>

<ul>
<li> RDF entailment rule <a>rdfD1a</a> was added in RDF 1.2.
<li>In D-interpretations, language tags are no longer converted to lowercase.
This is because the RDF 1.2 abstract syntax ignores the case of [[BCP47]] strings (unlike RDF 1.1).
In other words, `"chat"@fr` and `"chat"@FR` now have the <em>same</em> language tag in the abstract syntax,
and therefore it is not necessary to normalize them in the interpretation.
</li>
<li>RDF entailment rule <a>rdfD1a</a> was added in RDF 1.2.
This rule should have been included in RDF 1.1 when the two built-in
datatypes (<code>xsd:string</code> and <code>rdf:langString</code>)
were added to RDF entailment.
Expand Down
Loading