Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use definition of appears in from Concepts #99

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

use definition of appears in from Concepts #99

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pfps
Copy link
Contributor

@pfps pfps commented Mar 6, 2025

Fixes #98


Preview | Diff

@pfps pfps requested review from doerthe and franconi March 6, 2025 13:04
@pfps
Copy link
Contributor Author

pfps commented Mar 6, 2025

@pchampin What's going wrong now?

@pfps pfps added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Mar 6, 2025
@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

gkellogg commented Mar 6, 2025

@pchampin What's going wrong now?

If you look in the action run details, you see the following: “ Duplicate definition(s) of 'appears in,”.

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor Author

pfps commented Mar 6, 2025

Thanks. I think it's fixed now. I just need to learn to read "above" as "hidden in the details".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove the definition of "appears in" from semantics and link to RDF-concepts instead
3 participants