-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Triple terms and annotations #61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Some tests: Ignored Triple Term (no
|
spec/index.html
Outdated
@@ -68,7 +68,16 @@ | |||
in terms of Namespaces in XML, | |||
the XML Information Set [[XML-INFOSET]] | |||
and XML Base [[XMLBASE]].</p> | |||
<p>RDF 1.2 XML adds support for | |||
|
|||
<p>RDF 1.2 XML introduces <a data-cite="RDF12-CONCEPTS#dfn-triple-term">triple terms</a> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The RDF 1.2 XML
construction seems odd, given that the serialization is called RDF/XML
, not XML
.
I would expect either RDF 1.2 XML
or, more likely, RDF/XML 1.2
.
This might want its own issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In 1.1, it was "RDF 1.1 XML Syntax", and the title of this version is "RDF 1.2 XML Syntax". We did shorten it to "RDF 1.2 XML" in this one place, and it could be "RDF 1.2 XML Syntax".
Before that, it was "RDF/XML Syntax Specification", so there is precedent for reverting the naming scheme, but I rather prefer it this way. We could change this to "RDF 1.2 XML Syntax", though, to be more consistent.
IRIC, RDF/XML is an informal name for RDF xxx XML Syntax.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see.
I suggest that (versionless, i.e., including all versions) RDF/XML
be treated as an informal/short name for (versionless, i.e., including all versions) RDF xxx XML Syntax
, and that (version specific) RDF/XML xxx
be treated as an informal/short name for (version specific) RDF xxx XML Syntax
.
I feel like without Syntax
, RDF xxx XML
(which does occur twice in this paragraph, and once circa line 1205) will be more confusing than not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll change to RDF 1.2 XML Syntax throughout, to be consistent. If the group feels like changing the naming scheme, we can come back to that.
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Preview | Diff