Skip to content

Conversation

@N1arko
Copy link

@N1arko N1arko commented Dec 1, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added API documentation section to the README with links to Expenses API and Chat API reference guides.
    • Created comprehensive Expenses API documentation including authentication methods (OAuth 2.0 and API keys), endpoint specifications, request/response formats, and error handling with practical curl examples.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Walkthrough

Documentation-only changes add API documentation references to the README and introduce a new comprehensive Expenses API documentation file covering authentication, request/response structures, examples, and error handling.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation additions
README.md, docs/api/expenses.md
README updated with "API documentation" subsection linking to Expenses API and Chat API docs; new Expenses API documentation file added covering OAuth 2.0 and API key authentication, transaction endpoint details, request/response formats, error handling, and curl examples

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰✨ The docs now gleam with API light,
Expenses flows explained just right,
OAuth dances, keys align,
With examples clear and examples fine—
Our burrow's wisdom, now defined!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Document expenses API' directly matches the main change: adding documentation for the Expenses API to the repository.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee39bcf and 473f6d6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/api/expenses.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (1)

83-86: Verify linked Chat API documentation file exists.

The new "API documentation" section is appropriately placed and uses correct markdown link syntax. However, ensure that the referenced Chat API documentation file (docs/api/chats.md) actually exists in the repository to avoid broken links for users.

The verification script from the previous comment checks both files. If docs/api/chats.md does not exist, either remove that link or create the documentation file.

docs/api/expenses.md (1)

1-159: Well-structured API documentation with clear examples and comprehensive coverage.

The Expenses API documentation is comprehensive and well-organized. The authentication section clearly distinguishes between OAuth 2.0 and API key flows, the request schema is detailed with practical notes, the curl examples are realistic and demonstrate both auth methods, and the error handling guidance is helpful.

Note: Unable to verify the existence of docs/api/chats.md referenced in README.md due to repository access constraints.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jjmata
Copy link
Collaborator

jjmata commented Dec 1, 2025

Hey @N1arko ... instead of writing more API docs "the old way" can you work with Codex to finish #210 and add the transactions API documentation that way? 🙏

@jjmata jjmata self-requested a review December 1, 2025 19:08
@jjmata jjmata added this to the v0.6.6 milestone Dec 1, 2025
@jjmata jjmata marked this pull request as draft December 1, 2025 19:28
@jjmata
Copy link
Collaborator

jjmata commented Dec 1, 2025

Moving this to draft, let me know if you agree! 🙏

@jjmata jjmata removed their request for review December 4, 2025 20:28
@jjmata jjmata moved this to Backlog in Next release (v0.6.6) Dec 8, 2025
@jjmata jjmata mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants