Skip to content

Conversation

@rschev
Copy link
Member

@rschev rschev commented Oct 20, 2025

No description provided.

@rschev rschev requested a review from a team as a code owner October 20, 2025 09:59
@rschev rschev force-pushed the webhooks-endpoint branch from 35982ce to edecebb Compare October 20, 2025 09:59
@rschev rschev marked this pull request as draft October 20, 2025 12:10
@rschev rschev force-pushed the webhooks-endpoint branch from d54d0af to 4719f11 Compare October 29, 2025 16:55
@rschev rschev marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2025 16:55
@rschev rschev force-pushed the webhooks-endpoint branch 2 times, most recently from 0878b5c to b52b52e Compare October 30, 2025 08:32
Comment on lines +17 to +19
@AutoConfiguration(before = {
JOOQQueryEngineAutoConfiguration.class,
}, after = {
RabbitAutoConfiguration.class,
})
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This does not have any conditional annotations that depend on RabbitAutoConfiguration having run, so that dependency is not necessary.

And the before ordering should probably be an after ordering on JOOQQueryEngineAutoConfiguration, because that is the configuration that has a dependency on this. Inverting the ordering like this is a bit confusing

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Without after = RabbitAutoConfiguration, the ObjectProvider will always be empty.
With after = JOOQ instead of before, it will have a duplicate bean with the noopEventHandlers.

@rschev rschev force-pushed the webhooks-endpoint branch from e1d3fac to 0bccc84 Compare November 4, 2025 07:05
@rschev rschev force-pushed the webhooks-endpoint branch from 8ec1d03 to be9c940 Compare November 4, 2025 13:39
@xenit-eu xenit-eu deleted a comment from sonarqubecloud bot Nov 4, 2025
@rschev rschev force-pushed the webhooks-endpoint branch from be9c940 to 59d42ef Compare November 4, 2025 13:52
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 4, 2025

@rschev rschev requested a review from vierbergenlars November 4, 2025 13:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants