Skip to content

Conversation

@vjik
Copy link
Member

@vjik vjik commented Oct 31, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix? ✔️
New feature?
Breaks BC? ✔️

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (d16e214) to head (53dd3b0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              master      #494   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
- Complexity       652       653    +1     
===========================================
  Files             42        43    +1     
  Lines           1610      1614    +4     
===========================================
+ Hits            1610      1614    +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@vjik vjik requested a review from a team October 31, 2025 06:48
@vjik vjik added the status:code review The pull request needs review. label Oct 31, 2025
/**
* @internal
*/
final class TableNameAndAliasResolver
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you plan to reuse it?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only inside the package

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only in this place or somewhere else as well?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As it is now in PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

status:code review The pull request needs review.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants