Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement CI for backend-go #444

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Implement CI for backend-go #444

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

devleejb
Copy link
Member

@devleejb devleejb commented Feb 1, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it:

  • Implement CI for backend-go
    • Build
    • Lint
    • Formatiing
    • Testing

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:


Additional documentation:


Checklist:

  • Added relevant tests or not required
  • Didn't break anything

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • CI/CD

    • Added new GitHub Actions workflow for Go backend continuous integration.
    • Configured automated testing, linting, and build processes.
    • Set up Go version 1.21 for development.
  • Configuration

    • Updated Go version in project module.
    • Added linter configuration to skip specific directories.
    • Updated Echo framework dependency to direct requirement.

@devleejb devleejb self-assigned this Feb 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 1, 2025

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow for continuous integration of a Go backend project has been introduced. The workflow automates code quality checks, including formatting, linting, testing, and building. Concurrently, the project's configuration files have been updated, with changes to the Go version in the module file and linter configuration. The modifications aim to streamline the development process and maintain code standards for the backend Go project.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml New CI workflow added for Go backend, triggered on pushes/PRs to main branch; includes steps for code checkout, Go setup, tool installation, dependency management, formatting, linting, testing, and building.
backend-go/.golangci.yml Added skip-dirs configuration to exclude api/codepair/v1/models from linting.
backend-go/go.mod Updated Go version from 1.23.3 to 1.21; added direct dependency for github.com/labstack/echo/v4 at version v4.13.3.

Suggested Reviewers

  • kokodak
  • binary-ho
  • sihyeong671
  • krapie
  • blurfx
  • window9u

Possibly Related PRs

  • Initialize echo backend project #436: The changes in the main PR, which focus on setting up a CI workflow for a Go backend project, are related to the retrieved PR that initializes the echo backend project, as both involve configuring the Go environment and tools necessary for development and testing.

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, a workflow springs,
Golang's rhythm, CI softly sings.
Linting, testing, with rabbit-like grace,
Dependencies dance at a swift, clean pace.
Build and deploy, our digital friend! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7435e2e and 6bbfd4e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml (1)

14-17: Job Configuration.

The "build-and-test" job is configured to run on ubuntu-latest, which is acceptable; however, if you want to ensure consistency across environments, consider pinning to a specific Ubuntu version.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 04b398e and ad8a413.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml

[error] 40-40: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml (7)

1-13: Trigger Conditions and Paths.

The trigger block is well-defined for both push and pull_request events, targeting changes in the workflow file and in the "backend-go" directory. This setup ensures that the CI runs only when relevant parts of the repository are modified.


18-21: Code Checkout Step.

Using actions/checkout@v4 for retrieving the repository code is appropriate and follows best practices.


22-26: Go Environment Setup.

The action actions/setup-go@v5 is correctly used with an explicit Go version (1.18). Ensure that this version aligns with your project requirements; if you intend to update to a more recent version, consider adjusting this setting.


27-29: Tool Installation Step.

The "Install Tools" step runs make tools, which likely installs all required development dependencies. It would be beneficial to verify that the Makefile target handles caching and error reporting gracefully in the CI environment.


30-32: Build Step.

The "Build" step uses make build to compile the application. Confirm that the Makefile's build target is properly configured for a CI context and reports errors clearly.


33-35: Code Formatting Step.

Running make fmt ensures that the code is formatted according to the project's Go standards. Verify that this step does not inadvertently modify source files or generate unwanted file changes during CI runs.


36-38: Linting Step.

The "Lint" step, which runs make lint, is a crucial checkpoint for catching stylistic or potential programming errors early. Just ensure that your linter configuration reflects your most current code standards.

.github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@kokodak kokodak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've left a few simple suggestions!

.github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@devleejb devleejb requested a review from kokodak February 1, 2025 15:02
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml (1)

55-55: Nitpick: Add a Newline at the End of the File

Static analysis indicates there is no newline at the end of this file. Please add a newline at the end to adhere to YAML best practices and to avoid linting errors.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f1aa546 and 7435e2e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml

8-8: both "paths" and "paths-ignore" filters cannot be used for the same event "push". note: use '!' to negate patterns

(events)


15-15: both "paths" and "paths-ignore" filters cannot be used for the same event "pull_request". note: use '!' to negate patterns

(events)

Comment on lines 3 to 9
push:
branches: [main]
paths:
- ".github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml"
- "backend-go/**"
paths-ignore:
- "backend-go/design/**"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Update Trigger Filters for Push Events

Using both paths and paths-ignore for the same event is not supported by GitHub Actions (as flagged by YAMLlint). Instead, use a single paths array with negated patterns. For example, you can replace:

-    paths:
-      - ".github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml"
-      - "backend-go/**"
-    paths-ignore:
-      - "backend-go/design/**"
+    paths:
+      - ".github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml"
+      - "backend-go/**"
+      - "!backend-go/design/**"

This update will ensure the push event triggers correctly.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
push:
branches: [main]
paths:
- ".github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml"
- "backend-go/**"
paths-ignore:
- "backend-go/design/**"
push:
branches: [main]
paths:
- ".github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml"
- "backend-go/**"
- "!backend-go/design/**"
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

8-8: both "paths" and "paths-ignore" filters cannot be used for the same event "push". note: use '!' to negate patterns

(events)

Comment on lines 11 to 16
branches: [main]
paths:
- ".github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml"
- "backend-go/**"
paths-ignore:
- "backend-go/design/**"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Update Trigger Filters for Pull Request Events

Similarly, for pull request events the use of both paths and paths-ignore should be consolidated. Replace them with a single paths array using negated patterns. For instance:

-    paths:
-      - ".github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml"
-      - "backend-go/**"
-    paths-ignore:
-      - "backend-go/design/**"
+    paths:
+      - ".github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml"
+      - "backend-go/**"
+      - "!backend-go/design/**"

This approach simplifies the configuration and avoids potential conflicts.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
branches: [main]
paths:
- ".github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml"
- "backend-go/**"
paths-ignore:
- "backend-go/design/**"
branches: [main]
paths:
- ".github/workflows/ci_backend_go.yaml"
- "backend-go/**"
- "!backend-go/design/**"
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

15-15: both "paths" and "paths-ignore" filters cannot be used for the same event "pull_request". note: use '!' to negate patterns

(events)

Copy link
Member

@kokodak kokodak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for considering the suggestions!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants