Release sapling-crypto version 0.7.0#185
Conversation
ed02985 to
d1df461
Compare
This update removes the `no_std` feature from `typenum`; --no-default-features behavior is now correct and does not require additional flagging for `no_std` support.
|
@zodl-review |
🤖 Claude ReviewReview: sapling-crypto v0.7.0 Release1. SummaryRelease PR for sapling-crypto 0.7.0: bumps version, updates dev-dependencies (criterion 0.4→0.5, pprof 0.11→0.15), removes the 2. Risk AssessmentLow. This is a release/housekeeping PR with no changes to cryptographic code, consensus-relevant logic, or public APIs beyond what was already merged under 3. Key ObservationsGood:
Needs attention:
4. Suggestions
No consensus or cryptographic concerns. Automated review by |
|
@y4ssi - interesting that ZODLbot thinks it's 2025. Is that something in its system prompt, skill or just part of its training data, I wonder? |
|
@schell Good catch — it's the training data cutoff, not the system prompt. The model (Opus 4.7, trained through May 2025) has no built-in clock and I wasn't injecting today's date into the user prompt, so anything in 2026+ looked like a placeholder to it. Just pushed a fix: the prompt now starts with Thanks for surfacing it — exactly the kind of feedback the silent pilot was looking for. |
|
@zodl-review |
🤖 Claude ReviewReview: sapling-crypto PR #185 (Release v0.7.0)1. SummaryRelease PR for 2. Risk AssessmentLow. This is a release/infrastructure PR with no changes to cryptographic code, circuit logic, nullifier derivation, or consensus-relevant paths. The main runtime-facing change ( 3. Key ObservationsGood:
Needs attention:
4. Suggestions
Recommendation: Approve after CHANGELOG tidy-up. Automated review by |
No description provided.