doc: develop: manifests: external: add arduino core

[DhruvaG2000]

Add documentation for the Arduino Core API for zephyr which sits as an external module as of today.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[soburi]

I think it would be better to change the name, including the github path, to arduinocore-zephyr (and ArduinoCore-Zephyr)
instead of arduino-core-zephyr.
This differs from the Arduino module naming convention,
so I'm concerned that this may cause problems somewhere.

[DhruvaG2000]

I think it would be better to change the name, including the github path, to arduinocore-zephyr (and ArduinoCore-Zephyr) instead of arduino-core-zephyr. This differs from the Arduino module naming convention, so I'm concerned that this may cause problems somewhere.

@soburi , are you suggesting renaming https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/arduino-core-zephyr to arduinocore-zephyr? IMO the words arduino and core are separate and thus separated by - . I feel like that's the correct way to write it no?
Instead, would it make more sense for me to rather go fix instances of arduinocore-zephyr to arduino-core-zephyr?

[soburi]

@soburi , are you suggesting renaming https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/arduino-core-zephyr to arduinocore-zephyr? IMO the words arduino and core are separate and thus separated by - . I feel like that's the correct way to write it no?
Instead, would it make more sense for me to rather go fix instances of arduinocore-zephyr to arduino-core-zephyr?

While that's certainly true in notation, but it's difficult to consider this module
in isolation from the Arduino use case.
I think it would be better to respect their previous naming conventions, such as

https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-avr
https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-mbed
https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-samd

to avoid future problems.

[DhruvaG2000]

@soburi , are you suggesting renaming https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/arduino-core-zephyr to arduinocore-zephyr? IMO the words arduino and core are separate and thus separated by - . I feel like that's the correct way to write it no?
Instead, would it make more sense for me to rather go fix instances of arduinocore-zephyr to arduino-core-zephyr?

While that's certainly true in notation, but it's difficult to consider this module in isolation from the Arduino use case. I think it would be better to respect their previous naming conventions, such as

https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-avr https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-mbed https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-samd

to avoid future problems.

alright, renamed to https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/ArduinoCore-zephyr

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud