Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
/kubedoopcopies, under/usr/local/libexec/kubedoop-java-devel.Local verification
Scope and review
Only java-devel and its own workflow change. No product versions, unrelated worktrees, operator changes, merges or releases. Detached/setsid-escaping applications are outside the foreground process-group contract. Container INT requests graceful TERM from the supervisor.
Functional review checked inherited CMD/USER, actual canonical tool/slave selection, modern JAVA_HOME layout, protected helpers versus downstream COPY, real JAR exit/hook ordering and persistence, source-to-image identity and the native architecture matrix. No outstanding actionable findings after fixes. Framework feedback: this image-side Bash lifecycle belongs in containers, not operator-go; no operator-go defect exposed.
Latest-head native CI, including all nine affected Java product workflows, must become terminal successful before the rollout advances. This local verification report does not claim remote CI success.