Tutorial: fix navigation breaking when too many steps #6799
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
PR UpdateBetter idea from Sean: wrap excessive page buttons into a second(+) row(s). 
|
goplayoutside3
approved these changes
Mar 29, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good! I used this project with overflow of tutorial steps to test: https://local.zooniverse.org:3000/projects/leinwc/island-critter-cam/classify/workflow/26051?env=production&demo=true
shaunanoordin
force-pushed
the
tutorial-paging-improvement
branch
from
b79fd81 to
f72805d
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Overview
Package: lib-classifier
Closes #6798
This PR provides a rudimentary fix for the Tutorial system's StepNavigation, to prevent the Tutorial UI from completely breaking when a tutorial has too many steps.
Before this patch:
After this patch:
(Previous solution:)
This solution was replaced after this comment.
Status
Ready for review.