-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Support Differential for NI hardware's analog inputs as fallback #2486
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
t-b
wants to merge
7
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
feature/2486-allow-different-ADC-methods-for-NI
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@timjarsky Ready to test! |
Zayd is testing. I gave him the installer today. |
@t-b , from Zayd:
|
@timjarsky Thanks for testing. Should be fixed now. Please retest. |
088c100
to
a247f58
Compare
In a future commit we want to make it configurable.
Add an ADCConfig parameter which allows to pass in the output from HW_NI_GetAnalogInputConfig. We now only use RSE if it is supported and fallback to Differential if available. If that is also not available we bail out.
We want that information in the issue template as well and MEN_CreateIssueOnGithub() uses this function.
Up to now we only supported configuring ADC channels with RSE when using NI hardware. Although this is the preferred configuration [1] some NI hardware does not support that. We have a user report now that hacked-in Differential support works, so let's fallback to that with a message. The available ADC configurations are also stored in the labnotebook. [1]: https://knowledge.ni.com/KnowledgeArticleDetails?id=kA00Z0000019QRZSA2
We need to use the names accepted by the NIDAQ MX operations and functions. See for example the help for DAQmx_AI_SetupReader.
a247f58
to
184256c
Compare
@timjarsky Any update from Zayd? |
He continues to be unable to get his NI hardware to work with this PR (the hack did work) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Close #2484
Close #2472