Skip to content

Conversation

@evgeni
Copy link
Member

@evgeni evgeni commented Jan 5, 2024

No description provided.

Comment on lines 25 to 26
- name: Run Rubocop
run: bundle exec rubocop
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to run rubocop in a matrix as well? Thoughts on just using https://github.com/theforeman/actions#rubocop & https://github.com/theforeman/actions#gem-test instead?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't want to disrupt the rest of the action just yet.
Matrixing Rubocop doesn't hurt. Long term we should move to shared actions, but IMHO don't need today.

Copy link
Member

@ianballou ianballou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good to me. If not done now, should we make a redmine for the rubocop matrixing?

@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented Jan 5, 2024

Nah, it's fine.

There is some general discussion about how we could/should test proxy plugins in theforeman/actions#27

Depending on the outcome, I'd then see to open PRs or Redmines ;)

@ianballou ianballou merged commit fdbab02 into Katello:main Jan 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants